DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 05.07.2022
CASE NO: CS(OS) No. 144 of 2019
NAME OF HON'BLE COURT: High Court of Delhi
NAME OF HON'BLE JUDGE: The Honourable Justice Shree Navin Chawla
CASE TITLE: 3M Company Vs Vikas Sinha and another
Brief Note on the case: 1.The Defendants filed the written statement after delay of 118 days after service of summons. Para 2.5.
2. The written statement, which was filed after delay of 118 days, was not accompanied with any application seeking condonation of delay. Para 5.6.
3.The reason given by the defendant that the same was trying to amicably settle the dispute does not amount to be plausible reason. Para 5.9.
4.In such situation, the application seeking condonation of delay was rightly rejected. Para 5.10.
Ajay Amitabh Suman, IPR Advocate,
Hon’ble Delhi High Court,
ajayamitabh7@gmail.com,
9990389539
=============
जंजीर
-
जंजीर
जहाँ आदम की जात और बाते हों पीर की।
प्यादे की चाल और बातें वजीर की।
खेत हो किसानों के गेहूं अमीर की।
अमन के नाम पर बातें हो तीर की।
देख कही...
1 week ago
