Showing posts with label Amba Shakti Steel Vs Sequence Ferro Private Ltd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amba Shakti Steel Vs Sequence Ferro Private Ltd. Show all posts

Thursday, September 5, 2024

Amba Shakti Steel Vs Sequence Ferro Private Ltd

In the High Court of Delhi, Amba Shakti Steels Ltd. (appellant) filed an appeal against an order dismissing its application for interim relief in a trademark infringement case against Sequence Ferro Private Limited (respondent). The appellant, established in 1989 and operating under various trademarks including AMBA and AMBA SHAKTI, alleged that the respondent's use of the trademark AMMAJI for similar steel products infringed its registered trademarks and constituted passing off.

The appellant, with a significant turnover and extensive marketing efforts, claimed that the respondent's adoption of AMMAJI was made with malafide intention to capitalize on its goodwill. The respondent, however, argued that the trademarks were not similar, the appellant had not acted with clean hands, and there was no likelihood of confusion due to the vigilance of customers for high-value items like TMT bars.

The Commercial Court dismissed the appellant's application, finding the trademarks dissimilar and the appellant had not taken action against other entities using similar marks. On appeal, the High Court found that the Commercial Court had not adequately considered the overall commercial impression of the trademarks and that the appellant was not required to pursue action against all similar mark users to protect its rights.

The High Court noted the appellant's long-standing use of its trademarks, the respondent's recent adoption of AMMAJI, and the potential for customer confusion due to the similarity in the marks' overall impression. The Court also considered the appellant's larger turnover and the balance of convenience in its favor. The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting an interim injunction restraining the respondent from using the trademark AMMAJI or any deceptively similar marks until the suit's disposal.

Case Citation: Amba Shakti Steel Vs Sequence Ferro Private Ltd: 03.09.2024: 2024:DHC: 6703-DB: FAO (COMM) 41/2024: DHC: Vibhu Bakhru and Tara Vitasta Ganju, H.J.

Written by: Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman
IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney] United & United
Email: amitabh@unitedandunited.com, Phone: 9990389539

Disclaimer:

The information shared here is intended to serve the public interest by offering insights and perspectives. However, readers are advised to exercise their own discretion when interpreting and applying this information. The content herein is subjective and may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation.

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog