=============
CASE LAW DISCUSSED:
Judgement date:19.10.2022
Suit No. CS Comm No. 735 of 2022
Name of Court: High Court of Delhi
Name of Hon'ble Justice: Jyoti Singh, H.J.
Case Title: Siddhant Icecreams LLP and Ors Vs Amit Pahlani and Ors
Plaintiff's Family Trademark: NATURAL
Plaintiff's Product: Ice Cream, Ice Cream Shakes
Defendant's Trademark: NATURAL
Defendant's Acronymn: NIC [Natural Ice Cream]
Defendant's domain Name:
www.niceicecreams.com and www.nicnaturalicecreams.com
Meta Tag: NATURAL
Defendant's product: Ice Cream
Defendant: Ex distributor of Plaintiff
Ex Parte Injunction granted
Ajay Amitabh Suman, IPR Advocate, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi.
ajayamitabh7@gmail.com, 9990389539
=============
Information on this blog is being shared only for the purpose of creating legal awareness in public at large, especially in the field of Intellectual Property Right. As there may be possibility of error, omission or mistake in legal interpretation on the contents of this blog, it should not be treated as substitute for legal advise.
Showing posts with label Siddhant Icecreams LLP and Ors Vs Amit Pahlani and Ors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Siddhant Icecreams LLP and Ors Vs Amit Pahlani and Ors. Show all posts
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
- September 2025 (51)
- August 2025 (103)
- July 2025 (95)
- June 2025 (93)
- May 2025 (118)
- April 2025 (91)
- March 2025 (148)
- February 2025 (116)
- January 2025 (58)
- October 2024 (8)
- September 2024 (34)
- August 2024 (68)
- July 2024 (39)
- June 2024 (57)
- May 2024 (49)
- April 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (44)
- February 2024 (39)
- January 2024 (21)
- December 2023 (29)
- November 2023 (23)
- October 2023 (27)
- September 2023 (33)
- August 2023 (29)
- July 2023 (29)
- June 2023 (2)
- May 2023 (1)
- April 2023 (5)
- March 2023 (6)
- February 2023 (1)
- November 2022 (17)
- October 2022 (11)
- September 2022 (30)
- August 2022 (46)
- July 2022 (36)
- June 2022 (26)
- October 2020 (1)
- September 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (1)
- February 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (2)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (1)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (2)
- August 2018 (8)
- July 2018 (2)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (41)
- April 2018 (7)
- March 2018 (3)
- February 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (6)
- November 2017 (4)
- September 2017 (5)
- August 2017 (6)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (10)
- April 2017 (16)
- November 2016 (3)
- October 2016 (24)
- March 2015 (2)
- January 2014 (1)
- December 2013 (4)
- October 2013 (2)
- September 2013 (7)
- August 2013 (27)
- May 2013 (7)
- September 2012 (31)
- December 2009 (3)
- September 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (2)
- December 2008 (1)
Featured Post
WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING
WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK REGISTRA...
-
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1307/2016 M/S. KHUSHI RAM...
-
Species patents following a Markush patent must demonstrate a distinct inventive step Introduction The AstraZeneca AB & Anr. Vs. Intas ...
My Blog List
-
-
IPL:Spice In, Nationality Out - I was sitting in my office. It was a hot afternoon. The fan was running slowly and making strange sounds like an old typewriter. Files were lying on my d...4 months ago
-
-
My other Blogging Links
- Ajay Amitabh Suman's Poem and Stories
- Facebook-My Judgments
- Katha Kavita
- Lawyers Club India Articles
- My Indian Kanoon Judgments
- Linkedin Articles
- Speaking Tree
- You Tube-Legal Discussion
- बेनाम कोहड़ा बाजारी -Facebook
- बेनाम कोहड़ा बाजारी -वर्ड प्रेस
- बेनाम कोहड़ा बाजारी-दैनिक जागरण
- बेनाम कोहड़ा बाजारी-नवभारत टाइम्स
- बेनाम कोहड़ा बाजारी-ब्लॉग स्पॉट
- बेनाम कोहड़ा बाजारी-स्पीकिंग ट्री