$~19, 21
& 28
*
IN THE
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
FAO 443/2017 and C.M.
Nos.41035/2017 (stay) & 41036/2017 (exemption)
ANURAG SANGHI & ANR .....
Appellants
Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior
Advocate
with Ms. Nancy Roy,
Advocate,
Ms. Samreen Khan,
Advocate
and Mr. Rupin Bahl,
Advocate.
versus
KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL .....
Respondent
Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior
Advocate
with Mr. Ajay Amitabh
Suman,
Advocate.
+
FAO 445/2017 and C.M.
Nos.41115/2017 (stay) & 41116/2017 (exemption)
|
ANURAG
SANGHI & ANR
|
..... Appellants
|
|
Through:
|
Mr.
Chander M. Lall, Senior
|
|
|
Advocate
with Ms. Nancy Roy,
|
|
|
Advocate,
Ms. Samreen Khan,
|
|
|
Advocate
and Mr. Rupin Bahl,
|
|
versus
|
Advocate.
|
|
|
|
|
KNITPRO
INTERNATIONAL
|
.....
Respondent
|
|
Through:
|
Mr.
Harish Malhotra, Senior
|
|
|
Advocate with Mr. Ajay Amitabh
|
|
|
Suman,
Advocate.
|
FAO Nos.443/2017, 445/2017 & 446/2017 page 1 of
3
+
FAO 446/2017 and C.M.
Nos.41142/2017 (stay) & 41143/2017 (exemption)
ANURAG SANGHI & ANR .....
Appellant
Through: Mr. Chander M. Lall, Senior
Advocate
with Ms. Nancy Roy,
Advocate,
Ms. Samreen Khan,
Advocate
and Mr. Rupin Bahl,
Advocate.
versus
KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL .....
Respondent
Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior
Advocate
with Mr. Ajay Amitabh
Suman,
Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.
MEHTA O R D E R
% 14.11.2017
1. After
arguments, all the impugned orders dated 31.8.2017 in
FAO
No.443/2017 and 9.10.2017 in FAO Nos.445/2017 & 446/2017 are set
aside
with consent but the same will not be a reflection on the respective
cases of
the parties on merits so far as disposal of injunction applications
filed by
the respondents/plaintiffs is concerned.
2. Appellants will file written statements
alongwith their documents positively within three weeks from today and the
respondents/plaintiffs will file replications thereto alongwith their
FAO Nos.443/2017, 445/2017 & 446/2017 page 2 of
3
documents
within two weeks thereafter.
3. Trial court is requested to make endeavours to
expeditiously dispose of the injunction applications and trial court is
directed to impose very heavy costs on the party which seeks unnecessary
adjournments on the dates fixed for hearings of the injunction applications
filed by the respondents/plaintiffs. Since the impugned orders are set aside
whatever has been sealed or seized pursuant to the impugned orders, will be
available to the appellants/defendants for their business noting that there is
already a list prepared of the items by the Local Commissioners who are
appointed in the cases.
4. Appeals
are disposed of in terms of aforesaid observations.
5. Dasti to
the counsels for the parties.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2017
Ne
FAO Nos.443/2017, 445/2017 & 446/2017 page 3 of
3
