$~6
*
IN THE
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
FAO 14/2017 and C.M. No.738/2017 (stay)
VICKY
AGGARWAL TRADING AS M/S HAINEY GLOBAL
.....
Appellant
Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate
with Mr.
Lalit Vohra, Advocate.
versus
NAHAR SINGH MAHIPAL JAIN .....
Respondent
Through: Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.
MEHTA O R D E R
% 21.09.2017
1. After arguments, this appeal is disposed of with
the consent order that respondent/defendant will not use the trademark VEDAN
with respect to Monosodium Glutamate during the pendency of the suit, however,
the disposal of the suit is expedited. Trial court is requested to expedite the
disposal of the suit and not grant any unnecessary adjournments to the parties
and which if are sought can be visited by the trial court with heavy costs. It
is also agreed that trial court will not grant more than four opportunities to
each of the parties to complete their evidence in chief and
FAO No.14/2017 page 1 of
2
final arguments will be heard by the trial court in the case within a
period of four months of the completion of recording of evidence.
2. Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of aforesaid consent
order.
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
SEPTEMBER 21, 2017
Ne
FAO No.14/2017 page 2 of
2
