2
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CONT.CAS(C) 559/2016
M/S KAMDHENU LTD .....
Petitioner
Through:
Mr. S.K. Bansal, Advocate with
Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Kapil
Kumar
Giri and Mr. Vinay Kumar
Shukla,
Advocates.
versus
SHRAVAN KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent
Through: Respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
O R D E R
% 26.04.2017
Present
contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience
of the order dated 18th April, 2016 passed in TM No.79/2014 whereby a
Local Commissioner was appointed
to inspect and execute the commission
at respondent’s
premises i.e. Khasra
No.245, Village Bawari,
Murtikala
Zone, Sarna Dungar Industrial
Area, Jhotwara (Ext.), Jaipur, Rajasthan with
respect
to impugned trademark SSTAXON10000 and SSTAXON11000 and
2 KA
POWER,
In the petition, it has been averred that in pursuance to the aforesaid
order, the Local commissioner visited the aforesaid premises on 28th April,
2016, but
due to obstruction caused by respondent, the commission could
not be executed.
Today, learned counsel for petitioner states that the matter has been
amicably resolved between the parties and the suit has been disposed of in
accordance with the Settlement Agreement dated 30th December, 2016.
Learned counsel for petitioner also states that respondent has paid
Rs.10 lacs as damages/compensation to the petitioner.
Respondent is also personally present in Court and he has been
identified by the learned counsel for petitioner. He expresses regret for his
action and assures and undertakes to this Court that the same will never be
repeated. The apology tendered by respondent is accepted by this Court.
Consequently, present contempt petition is closed subject to respondent
paying an amount of Rs.1 lac to the New Delhi Bar Association Library Fund
within a period of one week.
In the event, the aforesaid amount is not paid within the stipulated
time, Registry is directed to list the matter before Court.
Order
dasti.
MANMOHAN, J
APRIL 26, 2017
js
