Introduction
This case concerns an intellectual property dispute filed before the Delhi High Court by Hermès International, a renowned French luxury fashion house, and its Indian subsidiary, against M/s Coco J, a sole proprietorship run by Ms. Sonal Chadha. The plaintiffs alleged rampant trademark infringement, passing off, and misappropriation of their iconic luxury products by the defendant.
Background of the Plaintiffs and Their Trademarks
Hermès, established in 1837, is globally known for high-end fashion products including the KELLY and BIRKIN handbags and H ORAN sandals. The brand owns numerous trademark registrations in India and internationally, including word marks, device marks, and three-dimensional shape marks. These products have gained iconic status worldwide, including India, where their popularity has been boosted by appearances in media and cinema.
Allegations Against the Defendant
The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant, through her website and social media channels, was manufacturing and selling counterfeit versions of their luxury products under deceptive names like JELLY KELLY, CANVAS KELLY, KIN, and ADELE. These names and designs closely mimicked Hermès’ registered trademarks and iconic designs, leading to confusion among consumers and dilution of brand value. It was also alleged that the defendant used Hermès' trademarks on promotional materials and engaged in direct references on Instagram.
Evidence Presented
Hermès submitted screenshots, comparison tables, and evidence of online purchases showing that the defendant’s products bore clear visual and conceptual similarities to Hermès' originals. These included the copying of distinctive bag shapes, names suggestive of the original products, and the unauthorized use of the H ORAN sandal design. The plaintiffs also provided photographic evidence from the defendant’s Instagram posts and product listings on her website.
Court’s Findings and Interim Relief
The Court, presided by Justice Amit Bansal, found a strong prima facie case in favor of Hermès. It held that the defendant’s products were deceptively similar to the plaintiffs’ trademarks and constituted trademark infringement and passing off. The Court noted that allowing the defendant to continue such acts would cause irreparable harm to Hermès’ reputation and mislead the public.
An interim injunction was granted restraining the defendant from manufacturing, selling, advertising, or displaying the infringing products online or offline. The defendant was also directed to take down all listings of the impugned products from her website and social media platforms.
Case Title: Hermès International & Anr. Vs. Coco J through Sole Proprietor Ms. Sonal Chadha
Date of Order: 17th April, 2025
Case No.: CS(COMM) 343/2025
Name of Court: High Court of Delhi
Name of Judge: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal
