Grant of Interim Injunction for Copyright Infringement and Unauthorized Use of Media Content"
Introduction
The plaintiff, Entertainment Network India Limited (ENIL), sought an interim injunction against the defendant, Miss Malini Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., for unauthorized use and infringement of its intellectual property rights. ENIL claimed exclusive ownership of the copyright and other rights related to its show "What Women Want" and alleged that the defendant violated terms of agreement by using media content without authorization.
Background
The dispute arises from the alleged unauthorized use of copyrighted material by the defendant. The plaintiff is a prominent radio broadcaster and media producer in India, owning various intellectual properties, including the show "What Women Want." The defendant, Miss Malini Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., operates social media platforms disseminating entertainment content.
In September 2024, the defendant was engaged by the plaintiff to conduct and promote an interview featuring a celebrity from the show. However, the defendant published the interview in violation of the agreed terms, leading to this legal action.
Brief Facts of the Case
- The plaintiff owns and produces the show "What Women Want," hosted by Kareena Kapoor Khan, and retains exclusive rights to its content.
- An agreement between the plaintiff and defendant outlined the terms for conducting and publishing an interview, subject to plaintiff’s prior approval.
- The defendant violated these terms by publishing the interview on its platforms, with its own logo and branding, without approval.
- The plaintiff issued a cease-and-desist notice, but the defendant continued publishing the content, leading to significant reputational and financial harm to the plaintiff.
- The plaintiff sought a permanent and dynamic injunction to restrain the defendants from further infringing its rights.
Issues Involved
- Whether the defendant’s actions constituted copyright infringement under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957.
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendant from unauthorized use of the content.
- Whether the defendant's branding on the interview content misrepresents the ownership of the work.
Plaintiff's Submissions:
- The plaintiff argued that it is the original and exclusive owner of all rights related to the show and its associated content.
- The defendant acted in bad faith by altering and publishing the interview with unauthorized branding.
- Unauthorized dissemination of the content caused irreparable harm to the plaintiff’s commercial interests.
- The plaintiff presented a prima facie case for infringement and sought immediate injunction to prevent further misuse.
Reasoning and Analysis by the Judge
Ownership and Infringement:
- The court found that the plaintiff established prima facie ownership of the copyrighted content.
- The defendant's unauthorized branding and dissemination of the interview infringed the plaintiff’s exclusive rights under the Copyright Act.
Decision
- The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from hosting, uploading, or distributing the plaintiff’s copyrighted content, including the interview, on any platform.
- The defendant was directed to remove all infringing content from its platforms within 48 hours of the order.
- In case of non-compliance by the defendant, intermediary platforms (YouTube and Instagram) were instructed to take down the content.
Conclusion
The order reinforced the principle of protecting intellectual property rights and maintaining the integrity of contractual agreements. By granting the injunction, the court ensured that the plaintiff’s rights were safeguarded against unauthorized use and misrepresentation. This case serves as a precedent for stringent enforcement of intellectual property laws in India’s media and entertainment industry.
IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney] United & United
Email: amitabh@unitedandunited.com, Phone: 9990389539
Disclaimer:
The information shared here is intended to serve the public interest by offering insights and perspectives. However, readers are advised to exercise their own discretion when interpreting and applying this information. The content herein is subjective and may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation.
