$~40
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: 14.12.2018
+
FAO 563/2018
MRS. MADHU MANCHANDA AND ANR .....
Appellants
Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate
and Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan and
Ms.
Aarti, Advs.
versus
M/S KRBL
LIMITED
Through:
.....
Respondent
Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate,
Mr.S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay
Amitabh Suman
and Mr. Avi
Bhandari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
1.
Notice. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.
Advocate, accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent.
2.
After making some submissions,
the learned counsel for the appellants does not press the appeal but submits
that directions may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of application
under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiff and their
application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. The next date of hearing before the
Trial Court is 22.01.2019.
F.A.O 563/2018 Page 1 of
2
3.
Ex-parte injunction was granted
by the trial court on 02.05.2016 against the appellant on the application of
the respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. The application for vacation of
stay under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC was filed by the Appellant on 19.05.2016. Both
these applications are still not disposed of by the Trial Court.
4.
In the circumstances, the appeal
is disposed of with the directions to the Trial Court to hear arguments on both
the applications on the next date and decide within a period of four weeks.
VINOD GOEL, J.
DECEMBER 14, 2018
“sandeep”
F.A.O 563/2018 Page 2 of
2
