Showing posts with label Star India Private Limited Vs. Stream2Watch.Pk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Star India Private Limited Vs. Stream2Watch.Pk. Show all posts

Saturday, March 22, 2025

Star India Private Limited Vs. Stream2Watch.pk

Factual Background:

The plaintiffs, Star India Private Limited and Novi Digital Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., are leading media and entertainment companies. Star India operates over 70 channels under the brand "STAR," broadcasting a wide range of content including sports events such as the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024. Novi Digital operates the popular streaming platform "Disney+ Hotstar," which also streams these events online. The plaintiffs hold exclusive media rights, including television broadcasting and digital streaming rights, for the ICC events in India for the period 2024-2027, as per the Media Rights Agreement with the International Cricket Council (ICC). The dispute arose when multiple rogue websites operated by the defendants were found to be illegally broadcasting and disseminating the plaintiffs' exclusive content related to the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024. The plaintiffs had previously faced similar infringements during events like the Tata IPL 2024.

Procedural Background:

The plaintiffs filed CS(COMM) 455/2024 before the Delhi High Court seeking a permanent injunction against defendants, including rogue websites, domain name registrars, internet service providers (ISPs), and government authorities. On 28th May 2024, the Court passed an ex-parte ad interim injunction restraining defendants from infringing the plaintiffs' rights by illegally streaming or broadcasting their content. The Court also directed domain registrars to lock and suspend domain names and ISPs to block access to the rogue websites. Subsequently, the plaintiffs identified and impleaded additional rogue websites as defendants. Despite being served, no written statements or affidavits of admission/denial were filed by the defendants, and the time for filing the same expired.

Provisions of Law Referred and Their Context:

Section 37 of the Copyright Act, 1957 was invoked by the plaintiffs, which grants broadcasting organizations exclusive broadcast reproduction rights. The plaintiffs argued that the unauthorized online streaming of the ICC T20 World Cup 2024 by rogue websites infringed their statutory rights under this section. Order VIII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was relied upon by the Court to decree the suit as uncontested, given the absence of a written statement from the defendants. The plaintiffs also invoked Order I Rule 10 of the CPC to implead additional rogue websites discovered during the proceedings.

Reasoning of Court"

The Court noted that the defendants had not filed any written statements, and in accordance with Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and Rule 3 of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules 2018, the unchallenged averments and documents filed by the plaintiffs stood admitted. The Court held that the rogue websites were knowingly engaged in exploiting the plaintiffs' exclusive rights by making unauthorized broadcasts of the ICC T20 World Cup 2024 content. This illegal dissemination infringed both copyright and broadcast reproduction rights, causing irreparable harm to the plaintiffs by reducing their revenues and diluting the commercial value of their rights. The Court found no defence on record from the defendants and concluded that there was no merit in continuing the suit to trial.

Decision:

The Delhi High Court passed a decree of permanent injunction in favour of the plaintiffs, restraining defendants no.1 to 11 and defendants no.33 to 175 (rogue websites) from further infringing the plaintiffs' rights. The Court accepted that the other reliefs stood satisfied, and the plaintiffs did not press for damages. 

Case Title: Star India Private Limited Vs. Stream2Watch.pk 
Date of Order: 3rd March, 2025
Case Number: CS(COMM) 455/2024
Name of Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi
Name of Hon’ble Judge: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Star India Private Limited Vs. Stream2Watch.Pk

Fact of the Case:

Star India Private Limited (plaintiff no.1) and Novi Digital Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (plaintiff no.2) hold exclusive digital and television broadcasting rights for the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2024, under an agreement with the International Cricket Council (ICC). The plaintiffs discovered that several rogue websites, including Stream2Watch.Pk and others, were illegally streaming or making available to the public the plaintiffs’ exclusive content (matches and highlights) without authorization, infringing their copyright and broadcast reproduction rights under Section 37 of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Procedural Background in Brief:

The suit was filed prior to the commencement of the ICC T20 World Cup 2024, seeking a permanent injunction to restrain defendants from unauthorized dissemination of the matches. On 28th May 2024, the Delhi High Court granted an ex parte ad interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the initial set of rogue websites and directing blocking of these websites by ISPs and domain registrars. As further rogue websites were identified, plaintiffs successfully impleaded defendants no.33 to 175. The defendants failed to file written statements within the prescribed period, and no defence was raised.

Reasoning of Court:

The Court noted that the defendants did not contest the suit, and the averments made in the plaint were deemed admitted. The Court found that the defendants' unauthorized dissemination of the ICC T20 World Cup 2024 content resulted in irreparable harm to the plaintiffs by infringing their copyrights and broadcast rights, and eroding the commercial value of these exclusive rights. The Court concluded that no trial was warranted and the suit could be decreed under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.

Decision:

The Court passed a decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants no.1 to 11 and defendants no.33 to 175 from illegally disseminating or broadcasting plaintiffs' exclusive content through rogue websites. The plaintiffs did not press for damages, as the interim reliefs had already been satisfied.

Case Details:

Case Title: Star India Private Limited & Anr. vs. Stream2Watch.Pk & Ors.
Date of Order: 3rd March 2025
Case Number: CS(COMM) 455/2024
Neutral Citation: Not provided
Name of Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi
Name of Hon'ble Judge: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog