Thursday, February 22, 2018

THE POLO/LAUREN COMPANY L.P VS ALTAF PASHA




$~20

*                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                   CS(OS) 645/2015 & I.A.Nos.4941/2015, 3922/2017, 3924/2017

THE POLO/LAUREN COMPANY L.P
..... Plaintiff

Through
Mr.Ajay Amitabh Suman with


Mr.Vinay Kumar Shukla and Mr.Som


Nath De, Advocates.


versus


ALTAF PASHA


..... Defendant

Through
Mr.Mohsin Israily with Mr.M.Saif


Islam Israily, Advocates.
CORAM:



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN


O R D E R


%
29.01.2018



The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement, passing off, delivery up, rendition of accounts etc.

On 28th March, 2017, the present suit was referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.

Mediation in the present case has been successful through the efforts of Mr.Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, Advocate-Mediator.

A Settlement Agreement has been executed between the parties on 15th November, 2017.
It                                                                                                                 is  pertinent        to         mention          that                                                                                                                   the           Supreme         Court  in                                                                                                                                                          Afcons

Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd., (2010) 8 SCC 24 while dealing with Section 89 of the CPC observed that the settlement agreement will have to be placed before the Court for recording it and in disposing of the suit in its terms, the Court should apply the principle of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC and make a decree in terms of the





settlement in regard to the subject matter of the suit, to make such settlement effective.

This Court is satisfied that the compromise between the parties contained in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement satisfies the requirements of Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The compromise contained in the aforesaid Settlement Agreement is lawful and therefore, this Court does not find any impediment in decreeing the present suit in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement.

Consequently, present suit is decreed in terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement dated 15th November, 2017 executed between the parties, which is marked as Ex.C-1. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet in terms thereof.

With the aforesaid observations, present suit and all pending applications stand disposed of.

List the matter for compliance on 14th May, 2018.



MANMOHAN, J
JANUARY 29, 2018


KA

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog