VICKY AGGARWAL VS NAHAR SINGH MAHIPAL SINGH

$~6

*                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                   FAO 14/2017 and C.M. No.738/2017 (stay)

VICKY AGGARWAL TRADING AS M/S HAINEY GLOBAL

..... Appellant

Through:        Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Advocate

with Mr. Lalit Vohra, Advocate.

versus

NAHAR SINGH MAHIPAL JAIN                                                     ..... Respondent

Through:        Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA O R D E R

%                                         21.09.2017

1. After arguments, this appeal is disposed of with the consent order that respondent/defendant will not use the trademark VEDAN with respect to Monosodium Glutamate during the pendency of the suit, however, the disposal of the suit is expedited. Trial court is requested to expedite the disposal of the suit and not grant any unnecessary adjournments to the parties and which if are sought can be visited by the trial court with heavy costs. It is also agreed that trial court will not grant more than four opportunities to each of the parties to complete their evidence in chief and

FAO No.14/2017                                                                                                          page 1 of 2

final arguments will be heard by the trial court in the case within a period of four months of the completion of recording of evidence.

2. Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of aforesaid consent order.

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J

SEPTEMBER 21, 2017

Ne

FAO No.14/2017                                                                                                          page 2 of 2