Thursday, July 7, 2022

Anugya Gupta Vs Ajay Kumar

DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 05.07.2022
CASE NO: CS(Comm) No. 422 of 2020
NAME OF HON'BLE COURT: High Court of Delhi
NAME OF HON'BLE JUDGE: The Honourable Justice Shree Navin Chawla
CASE TITLE: Anugya Gupta Vs Ajay Kumar

Brief Note on the case: 1.Plaintiff adopted trademark SARKARIRESULT on 01.01.2012. Para 2.

2. Defendant adopted SARKARIRESULT.INFO. Para 9.

3.Defendant also applied for SARKARIREULT before Registrar of Trademark. Para 9.

4.Defendants trademark was also registered. Para 9.

5.Defendant alleged to have adopted the impugned Trademark in 2015. Para 15

6.Plaintiff has already put on record its domain name SARKARIRESULT.COM registered on 01.01.2012. Para 24.

7. Registration does not prove its user. Para 32

8.The Defendant filed application as proposed to be used. Such declaration is final. Para 32

9.Plaintiff was granted relief as the defendant itself has applied for trademark registration, hence can not plead the same to be generic. Para 34

Ajay Amitabh Suman, IPR Advocate,
Hon’ble Delhi High Court,
ajayamitabh7@gmail.com,
9990389539
=============

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog