DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 08.06.2022:
CASE NO: Original Application No. 127 of 2019 in CS (Comm) No. 22 of 2022
CASE TITLE: Five Star Films Pvt. Ltd Vs Sri Thenandal Films and another
NAME OF HON'BLE COURT: Hon'ble High Court of Madras
NAME OF HON'BLE JUDGE: Hon'ble Justice Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy
Brief Note on the case: 1. The right of making remake of the film was not reassignable, still the same was re-assigned to other parties and at last to the Plaintiff. The Defendant No.3 did not assailed the same. Hence Defendant No.3 acquiesced in the assignment in favour of Plaintiff. Para 10,11.
2.Though movie of the Defendant MERSAL appears to have been inspired from Plaintiff's movie MOONDRU MUGAM as central characters are same. However Plaintiff failed to prove it to be copy of plaintiff's movie. Para 19.
3.As movie of the Defendant has already been released in theatre and OTT Platform, the relief of permanent injunction has become infructuous. Para 20
4.Plaintiff failed to prove any loss. Hence Plaintiff's not entitled to relief. Para 20.
5.As Plaintiff was looser, the Defendant was granted the cost of Rs. one Lakh towards lawyers fee and other expenses. Para 21
Ajay Amitabh Suman, IPR Advocate,
Hon’ble Delhi High Court,
ajayamitabh7@gmail.com,
9990389529
[Disclaimer: This information is being shared in the public interest only for creating legal awareness, especially in the field of Intellectual Property Right. As there may be possibility of error, omission or mistake in legal interpretation, It should not be treated as substitute for legal advise].
गर छोटा हो तुम छोटा
-
गर छोटा हो तुम छोटा,
गर तुमको कुछ ने रोका।
गर तुमको कुछ ने टोका
ना समझो खुद को खोटा।
जीवन में आगे बढ़ने से,
आखिर किसने तुमको रोका?
नहीं जरूरी हर लघुता...
6 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment