Monday, June 13, 2022

Proklean Technologies P. Ltd. Vs Godrej Consumer Products Ltd.

DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 09.06.2022:
CASE NO: Original Application No. 71 and 72 of 2022 in CS (Comm) No. 22 of 2022
CASE TITLE: Proklean Technologies P. Ltd. Vs Godrej Consumer Products Ltd.
NAME OF HON'BLE COURT: Hon'ble High Court of Madras
NAME OF HON'BLE JUDGE: Hon'ble Justice Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy

Brief Note on the case: 1. The Plaintiff has failed to put on record any deed of assignment in its favour in relation to Class 03 and class 05. Hence it could not be concluded that Plaintiff is the registered Proprietor of Trademark in class 03 and class 05. Para 8.

2.Sustainabilty of application is different from maintainability. Para 8.

3.There in no any estoppel against the Law. The Plaintiff maintain the action for infringement even though contrary to the stand taken before the Trademarks Registry. Para 12

4.Use of Trademark GODREJ along with PROCLEAN does not mitigate the chances of confusion.12

5.As balance of convenience was in favour of the Defendant, injunction was declined. Para 13

Ajay Amitabh Suman, IPR Advocate,
Hon’ble Delhi High Court,
ajayamitabh7@gmail.com,
9990389529

[Disclaimer: This information is being shared in the public interest only for creating legal awareness, especially in the field of Intellectual Property Right. As there may be possibility of error, omission or mistake in legal interpretation, It should not be treated as substitute for legal advise].

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog