Dinesh Kaushal Vs Promoshirt SA

$~72

*                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+                   FAO 136/2019 & CAV 326/2019 & CM APPL. 14625/2019 (Stay) & CM APPL. 14626/2019

DINESH KAUSHAL & ANR                                  ..... Appellants

Through:        Mr.        Saikrishna       Rajagopal,        Mr.

Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Prabhu Tandon,

Mr.   Nitin    Sharma,   Mr.   Sumant

Narang,   Ms.   Susasini   Raina,    Ms.

Senhima Janhavi, Advocates

versus

PROMOSHIRT SM S.A

Through:

..... Respondent

Mr.       Sanjeev       Sindhwani,      Senior

Advocates with Mr. S.K. Bansal and

Mr.   Ajay    Amitabh   Suman,      Mr.

Gaurav Ganesh Singh, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R

%                                         29.03.2019

The  appellants/defendants  are  aggrieved  by an  ex-parte  injunction

restraining them from using the trademark “SWISSTEK” alongwith logo, as

depicted herebelow:

The respondent/plaintiff is the owner of the trademark “SWISS MILITARY” alongwith logo, which is as under:-

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the two marks are dissimilar, both visually as well as phonetically; that because of the ex-parte injunction the appellants are suffering immense economic losses.

Be that as it may, it would be open to the appellants to take appropriate remedies before the learned Trial Court.

The learned counsel for the parties submit that they will cooperate in the appellants application for vacation of the ex-parte injunction and would request the learned Trial Court to dispose-off the application preferably within four weeks of it being filed. No adjournment shall be sought by either of the parties when the date is fixed.

In view of the above, the petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as being not pressed.

A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J

MARCH 29, 2019

savita