Thursday, April 16, 2026

Bennett Colemann and Co Vs E Entertainment

Bennett Coleman and Company Limited challenged two trademark registrations of the "E!" mark owned by E Entertainment Television LLC in India, arguing the marks lacked distinctiveness and had not been properly used in the country.

In the Delhi High Court proceedings, the company filed applications seeking permission to cross-examine the respondent's witness, whose affidavit supported the claimed use and reputation of the marks.

The court dismissed both applications, holding that trademark rectification cases are normally decided on written affidavits and documents alone, with cross-examination allowed only in rare cases where strong reasons are shown.

Court found no specific doubts raised about the public records or company documents exhibited, noting that cross-examination is not an automatic right and would turn these summary proceedings into unnecessary full trials. The cases have now been listed for further directions.

Bennett Colemann and Co Vs E Entertainment: 10.03.2026:C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 86/2022 :2026:DHC:2010: Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

Disclaimer: Donot treat this as substitute for legal advise as it may contain subjective errors.
Written By: Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman, IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney], High Court of Delhi

#IPUpdate #IPCaselaw #IPCaseLaw #IPLaw #IPRNews #IPIndiaupdate #Trademark #Copyright #DesignLaw #PatentLaw #Law #Legal #IndianIPUpdate #AdvocateAjayAmitabhSuman #IPAdjutor

No comments:

Post a Comment

Blog Archive

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog