Monday, August 8, 2022

Leeford Healthcare Limited Vs Vobb Healthcare

Order Date:08.08.2022
Case No. CS (Comm) 544 of 2022
Delhi High Court
Navin Chawla, H.J.
Leeford Healthcare Limited Vs Vobb Healthcare

Plaintiff’s Trademark: LEEOFORD DERMIFORD. The essential feature of the Plaintiff's Trademark was DERMIFORD as house mark LEEFORD was written in small font.
Plaintiff's Product: medicinal cream.


Reason for Adoption: Plaintiff explained the reason for adoption of this trademark. Plaintiff adopted the subject matter trademark in respect of a medicinal cream by taking the first four alphabets DERM from dermatology, being the branch of medicine with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases, and the suffix FORD from its FORD family of marks.


Plaintiff’s registration : Plaintiff's Trademark was registered under No. 3184968 with effect from 12.02.2016.


Defendant’s Trademark NEO DERMIFORD


Defendant’s Trademark Application:19.07.2022 as proposed to be used.
Defendant's product : Identical to that of the Plaintiff, i.e. medicinal creams.

Ex-parte injunction granted in favour of the Plaintiff as essential feature of competing trademarks was DERMIFORD. The Plaintiff was not only the registered proprietor of Trademark but also the prior adopter and user.

Ajay Amitabh Suman, IPR Advocate, Hon'ble High Court of Delhi
ajayamitabh7@gmail.com, 9990389539


No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog