Saturday, May 25, 2024

Shrinath Travel Agencies Vs Harsh Kumar.pdf

The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, has not only added Defendants in the suit, but also extended ex parte injunction agaist them, there by newly impleaded Defendants were also restrained from using the impugned Trademark SHRINATH. 

Case Title:  Shrinath Travel Agencies Vs Harsh Kumar
Order Date: 16.05.2024
Case No. CS(COMM) 340/2022
Neutral Citation:NA
Name of Court: Delhi High Court 
Name of Hon'ble Judge: Sanjeev Narula. H.J.

Disclaimer:

Ideas, thoughts, views, information, discussions and interpretation expressed herein are being shared in the public Interest. Readers' discretion is advised as these are subject to my subjectivity and may contain human errors in perception, interpretation and presentation of the fact and issue involved herein.

Written By: Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman,
IP Adjutor - Patent and Trademark Attorney,
Email: ajayamitabhsuman@gmail.com,
Ph No: 9990389539

#IPAdjutor #Legalupdate #IPUpdate #Indiaip #IPlaw #IPBlog #IPRIndia #Iplawyer #Ipadvocate #IPlearning #IPRNews #Law #Legal   #AdvAjayAmitabhSuman 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog