Friday, August 23, 2024

Dabur India Limited Vs Ashok Kumar

In the High Court of Delhi, Dabur India Limited filed a suit against Ashok Kumar and others for trademark infringement, copyright violation, passing off, and unfair competition. The plaintiff, represented by several advocates, sought various interim orders.

The nature of the dispute between Dabur India Limited and Ashok Kumar and Others involves allegations of trademark infringement, copyright violation, passing off, and unfair competition. Specifically, Dabur India Limited claims that unknown defendant no. 1 (likely associated with Ashok Kumar and Others) is operating fake domains and engaging in activities that infringe upon Dabur's registered trademarks and copyrights. This includes using Dabur's trademarks, logos, and content without authorization to deceive the public and solicit customer.

The suit alleges that unknown defendant no. 1 is operating fake domains and impersonating Dabur by using the company's trademarks and logos to deceive the public and solicit customers. The plaintiff provided evidence of the defendants' fraudulent activities, including screenshots of the impugned websites, forged identity cards, and bank accounts used for receiving payments from unsuspecting individuals.

The court issued an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using Dabur's trademarks, logos, and content on their websites and directed the defendants to take down the infringing URLs. The court also ordered the blocking of telephone numbers, WhatsApp numbers, Telegram links, and bank accounts associated with the defendants' fraudulent activities.

Case Citation: Dabur India Limited Vs Ashok Kumar:18.07.2024 : CS(COMM) 578/2024 : Delhi High Court: Mini Pushkarna: H.J

Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman
IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney]
United & United
Ph no: 9990389539

Disclaimer:

The information shared here is intended to serve the public interest by offering insights and perspectives. However, readers are advised to exercise their own discretion when interpreting and applying this information. The content herein is subjective and may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog