Sunday, December 7, 2025

Visage Beauty and Healthcare Private Limited Vs. Freecia Professional India Private Limited

Visage Beauty and Healthcare Pvt Ltd filed a suit in 2022 against Freecia Professional India Pvt Ltd for trademark infringement, passing off, and copyright violation alleging defendants copied its registered marks D-TAN, DERMOMELAN, SHINE & GLOW and verbatim reproduced ingredients lists and usage steps from its three O3+ facial kits on identical skincare products; defendants initially defended claiming marks descriptive/common to trade and content industry standard but were proceeded ex-parte. The Delhi High Court held that plaintiff established prima facie prior adoption, registrations, substantial goodwill through sales over Rs.28 crores and ads exceeding Rs.21 crores; finding slavish copying of literary content in ingredients/steps for all kits amounting to copyright infringement, dishonest use of DERMOMELAN, but SHINE & GLOWING descriptive not infringing SHINE & GLOW, and deferring D-TAN injunction due to unsubstantiated common use claims and pending rectification, granted interim injunction on 21.11.2025 restraining defendants from using copied layouts/ingredients/steps for the three kits and DERMOMELAN mark.

- To resist exclusivity on ground of marks being common to trade, defendant must substantiate substantial third-party use with evidence of extent, trade volume, and dilution impact; mere unsubstantiated claims or solitary instances insufficient (Para 8.6-8.7, 23).
- Verbatim reproduction of product descriptions like ingredients lists and usage steps constitutes prima facie copyright infringement in original literary works if unjustified by industry standards (Para 18.8, 20.2, 22.1).
- Descriptive phrases in rival product names may not infringe registered composite marks if overall get-up distinct and no deceptive similarity (Para 24.1).
- Single foreign third-party use does not validate domestic infringement of registered coined/fanciful mark absent evidence of commonality (Para 23.2-23.3).

Case Title: Visage Beauty and Healthcare Private Limited Vs. Freecia Professional India Private Limited & Anr.  
Order Date: 21 November 2025  
Case Number: CS(COMM) 633/2022  
Neutral Citation: Not yet assigned  
Court: High Court of Delhi at New Delhi  
Judge: Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora  

[Readers are advised not to treat this as substitute for legal advise as it may contain errors in perception, interpretation, and presentation]  

[Written By: Advocate Ajay Amitabh Suman, IP Adjutor [Patent and Trademark Attorney], High Court of Delhi]

No comments:

Post a Comment

Featured Post

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING

WHETHER THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARK IS REQUIRED TO BE SUMMONED IN A CIVIL SUIT TRIAL PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO PROVE THE TRADEMARK  REGISTRA...

My Blog List

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

IPR UPDATE BY ADVOCATE AJAY AMITABH SUMAN

Search This Blog